I have now
argued that the proofs of the existence of gods are wrong and that
the ideas of gods contain all manner of contradictions and
absurdities. Now I will turn to other issues, such as morality and
the dangers that religious thinking contains.
Are the Gods Worthy of Worship?
Even if the god of the Bible one day
proves his existence to me, I wouldn’t worship him (though I would
of course believe in him), because if you try to take a look at the
Bible and see how it describes God’s behaviour, then you’ll
quickly see, that he commits one despicable act after another.
He kills all
the first-born of Egypt, mainly for something that he himself makes a
pharaoh do (Exo 7:13 and Exo 13:15). He seems to endorse slavery (Lev
25:44-46), rape (2 Sam 12:11), murder (Lev 20:9) and the slaughtering
of those who aren’t a part of his chosen people (Deu 2:21). He
makes bears rip apart 42 children, simply because they mocked a
prophet (2 Kin 2:24). One could go on for a very long time just
listing the atrocities that the god of the Bible has committed or
endorsed, and it boggles the mind that anyone would want to worship
him.
Not only is
God apparently committing acts that are abhorrent to most humans, he
is also the reason that I was born with the personality I have, and
with his omniscience he must have known that I would be an atheist.
He would have to know that I value proof above blind faith. Therefore
it follows that when he created everything, he knew that I and
countless others, were destined to burn in the Hell he created.
Furthermore
let’s say, for the sake of argument, that before I die, I convert
and become a Christian and end up in Heaven. However some of the
people I love might not be there, since they aren’t baptised, they
could be tormented in Hell instead (1 Pet 3:21). How am I to live in
eternal happiness while knowing this? Even if we for the sake of the
argument assume that God can change me to be able to live that way,
then that's not the kind of person I want to be.
Some
may argue that most of the atrocities that God has committed belong
to an earlier age – the one described in the Old Testament – and
that with the coming of Jesus and the founding of Christianity the
main message is now about love. I don’t take much notice of such an
argument however, because of the following words of Jesus: "For
verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one
tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."
(Mat 5:18) – as far as I know the Heaven and the Earth haven't
passed yet. Furthermore Jesus with all his messages of love also had
this message: “But those mine enemies, which would not that I
should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.”
(See http://ffrf.org/nontracts/jesus.php
for a look a critical look at Jesus’ teachings.)
This section
has only dealt with the Christian god, but many of the other gods
that I've heard about is no better than the Christian god - Allah,
for example, brings a painful doom to anyone who doesn’t believe
his every word (2:7 and 4:150-151). There are of course also gods who
are less violent, but considering all the violence and evil they
allow in the world, I also have a hard time finding them worthy of
worship.
The Dangers of Religion
Not only do religious people waste
their time in devotion to cruel and non-existing gods, they also
represent a dangerous system of thought.
The dangers
come from the fact that religion can make people absolutely certain
that they are in possession of divine and infallible truth, and that
this allows them to do whatever they like to anyone who doesn’t do
what their interpretation of the religion demands. As Voltaire
succinctly put it: “Those who can make you believe absurdities can
make you commit atrocities.”
History has
shown us one example after another of the atrocities of religion. The
Christian crusades led to numerous wars and the massacre of hundreds
of thousands of innocent people. The witch trials exemplify how badly
the juridical system can be perverted by religion, and tens of
thousands of people were executed without any possibility of
defending themselves against the baseless accusations, and many were
tortured during their trials.
Today we see
how religious fanatics blow themselves and innocent children up, and
fill their pockets with nails, so that the explosions can maim even
more people.
Furthermore
religion have time and again been used to oppress people and force
them to abide by dehumanizing rules, and it stops free thought dead
in its tracks, which makes it even easier to prevent people from
improving their lot and question their dictators.
All of these
things make me so angry, that I struggle to put it into words. How
dare such people presume to make themselves lords of their
neighbours, based on a book filled with blessings of violence, rape
and war written by primitive people millennia ago?
Religion can
also be physically dangerous to the believers. Blood transfusions,
for example, are not allowed by some religions and some, such as the
members of the Christian sect called Christian Science, turn to
prayer instead of doctors and medicine.
Furthermore
religion can also give people reasons for not helping others. The
Karmic Law for instance basically leads to the conclusion, that if
you have an illness or is born with a defect, then it’s your own
fault – and is caused by something you did in this or another life.
This is, in my opinion, a detestable point of view.
Morality
Atheists are often told by theists that
since they aren't religious, they can’t behave morally. However I think it says quite a bit
about the morality of those saying such things. Who is really the
more moral person, he who behaves well by his own volition, or he who
only behaves well because he’s threatened with the eternal torment
of hell?
Furthermore
even Christians tend to put their own moral standards above those
given by their god, this can be seen from the way they pick and
choose among the numerous commandments of the Bible. They don't
accept them all, they only select those that are consistent with
their own internal moral compass, and this undermines arguments based
on a superior god given morality.
I also don’t
find it the moral thing to do, to worship a being who has numerous
atrocities on his conscience, and I find it quite ironic that the
Bible is called “The Good Book”.
The fact
that people seem let the opinions of priests carry greater weight in
matters of ethics and morality baffles me. As I see it, it's as if
people accept arguments like the following:
'I have
this invisible friend – I can't show you that he exists, but trust
me, he does. He's childish, cruel and vindictive and his morals
belong to a society that is completely different from ours. I want to
carry out his will together with my sexist organization who have time
and again shown that when it gets sufficient power it will oppress,
kill or torture those who don't agree with it. Therefore I should
have a greater say in matters of ethics and morality.'
This
argument would of course be a laughing stock – that is until
someone calls his invisible friend God, then it's suddenly deemed to
be reasonable.
The Advantages of Atheism
Some see a
disadvantage in the lack of “magic” in the world of the atheist –
I don’t. I think that the real world is awe inspiring without the
filter of religion. As the author Douglas Adams puts it: “Isn't
it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe
that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?”
Religion
limits people by imposing nonsensical rules created by humans in a
totally different society. Atheism on the other hand sets us free. It
breaks down the barriers that exist between persons, who each have
their own version of the “one true belief”, and atheists don’t
have to feel guilty for enjoying beer, pork or sex.
Should Religion be Exempt from
Critique and Satire?
There seems to be a wide spread
acceptance of the idea that it’s wrong to criticize other people’s
religious ideas, and while political satire is completely acceptable,
religious satire isn’t. I must admit that the reasoning behind this
eludes me.
If someone
believes that the best way to combat unemployment is to chop off
everybody’s hands, then no one would demand that we respect this
point of view and think it beyond critique or satire. Why then is it
that such demands are made regarding the dangerous and absurd claims
of religion?
I won’t
respect a point of view that is arguably silly and morally abhorrent
to me, and I will reserve the right to criticize it with or without
the use of satire. On the other hand I accept the right of others to
hold such points of view.
By putting
religion beyond critique, we risk being stuck in a quagmire of
religious ignorance, oppression and violence.
On the other
hand we shouldn’t mock religion, but there’s a difference between
mocking and satire. Mocking is simply putting other people down,
while satire is a useful tool for making a point clearer through the
use of humour and exaggeration.
Conclusion
Though I
have spent a considerable amount of time reading, thinking and
arguing about religion, I of course haven’t investigated each and
every imaginable god and each and every argument. I can’t
definitely prove that a god can’t possibly exist. I have, however,
looked into several religions, and can argue that their gods are
implausible or simply impossible.
This leads
me to the point that has finally made me conclude that no god exists,
and I would like to end this essay with a small parable that
illustrates it.
Once upon a
time a hermit lived in a cave near the top of a tall mountain. The
entrance of the cave was next to a plateau, which had a sharp edge
leading to a long and steep fall.
People often
came to the plateau and many stopped by the cave and talked to the
hermit. Each and every one of these people fervently believed that if
they jumped off the edge while flapping their arms vigorously and
chanting a magic word, then they would be able to fly.
Each and
every one of them were convinced that the magic word they were using
were the right one, and each and every one of them crashed into the
cliffs below the edge.
After years
of this happening the hermit got tired of listening to the visitors’
rambling stories about how fantastic their particular magic word was,
and he finally put up a sign outside his cave. It read:
No, your
magic word won’t work, and if you are sure that it will anyway,
then please don’t come and tell me about it, until it really has
made you fly.
DISCLAIMER: Publications on the Atheistic Forum website
are contributed by different authors. The views and opinions expressed by the author
in this publication are not necessarily those supported by Atheistic Forum. Likewise,
Atheistic Forum cannot guarantee the validity of any information found in this publication.
This publication is provided "as is", without warranty of any kind, either
expressed or implied, including, without limitation, warranties of fitness for a
particular purpose and non-infringement. This publication may be subject to copyright
restrictions, so further reproduction or redistribution for private use or gain
must be arranged directly with the copyright holder.